The International Criminal Court (ICC) recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, alleging war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Gaza conflict. This development has elicited varied responses from European nations, with Hungary’s position notably divergent.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has openly criticized the ICC’s decision, labeling it “outrageously impudent” and “cynical.” He announced an invitation for Prime Minister Netanyahu to visit Hungary, assuring that the ICC’s warrant would not be enforced during his stay. Orbán emphasized that Hungary would defy the ICC’s decision, ensuring no consequences for Netanyahu within its borders.
While Hungary has pledged non-compliance with the ICC’s warrant, several European countries have expressed their commitment to uphold international law:
- Ireland: Prime Minister Simon Harris stated that Ireland supports international courts and would apply their warrants, indicating readiness to arrest Netanyahu if he entered the country.
The Sun - France: Foreign Minister Christophe Lemoine acknowledged the ICC’s decision, reiterating France’s attachment to the independent work of the Court, though he did not explicitly confirm whether France would arrest Netanyahu.
- United Kingdom: A spokesperson for Prime Minister Keir Starmer affirmed respect for the ICC’s independence but did not confirm whether Britain would uphold the warrants.
Hungary’s stance highlights a significant divide within the European Union regarding the enforcement of international judicial decisions. Orbán’s invitation to Netanyahu and assurance of safety in Hungary underscore the close political relations between the two leaders, contrasting with the positions of other EU member states that have pledged to honor the ICC’s warrants.
The ICC’s arrest warrants for Israeli leaders have prompted a spectrum of responses across Europe. Hungary’s decision to disregard the warrants and welcome Prime Minister Netanyahu reflects its unique diplomatic stance, potentially influencing future EU cohesion on matters of international law and justice.
